The
Stressed Electorate
Stress and the Iraqi War
It is certainly understandable for an American soldier, out on patrol
in Ghazaliyah, one of Baghdad's most dangerous neighborhoods, to be
under considerable stress. But what is going on in the minds of the
people sitting in the comfort of their homes watching it on cable TV?
Are they stressed too? And has this imperceptible, yet persistent stress
resulted in the downfall of the Conservative government in America?
According
to the results from our Iraqi War Attitudes Survey, the Liberal
support for the war is almost completely gone, while the Moderates have
shifted heavily against it. The Libertarians are holding support a little
better than the Moderates, while the Conservatives are unique in their
ability to support foreign warfare for long periods of time.
We
asked the 3,501 respondents to our survey, do you feel any stress
from the Iraqi War? The options to this question were never,
rarely, sometimes, always, and every time I think about
it. Those responses are broken down by political-gender cohorts
in the table below.
|
Gender
|
Political Cohort
|
Never
|
Rarely
|
Some
times
|
Every time I think about it
|
Always
|
|
Female
|
NP
|
11.4%
|
18.6%
|
21.4%
|
35.7%
|
12.9%
|
|
Female
|
VL
|
2.9%
|
7.7%
|
32.4%
|
48.8%
|
8.2%
|
|
Female
|
L
|
1.2%
|
13.7%
|
30.3%
|
47.3%
|
7.5%
|
|
Female
|
LB
|
7.6%
|
9.4%
|
34.0%
|
39.6%
|
9.4%
|
|
Female
|
M
|
9.0%
|
9.9%
|
36.0%
|
31.5%
|
13.5%
|
|
Female
|
C
|
5.3%
|
24.7%
|
49.3%
|
16.7%
|
4.0%
|
|
Female
|
VC
|
23.0%
|
12.2%
|
40.5%
|
23.0%
|
1.4%
|
|
Male
|
NP
|
25.4%
|
19.5%
|
30.2%
|
19.5%
|
5.4%
|
|
Male
|
VL
|
11.7%
|
20.6%
|
35.4%
|
27.8%
|
4.5%
|
|
Male
|
L
|
15.1%
|
19.6%
|
40.3%
|
21.7%
|
3.3%
|
|
Male
|
LB
|
21.9%
|
28.9%
|
36.7%
|
10.2%
|
2.3%
|
|
Male
|
M
|
20.9%
|
23.5%
|
40.0%
|
11.5%
|
4.1%
|
|
Male
|
C
|
21.0%
|
27.3%
|
41.1%
|
8.6%
|
2.1%
|
|
Male
|
VC
|
24.9%
|
24.7%
|
38.5%
|
9.1%
|
2.8%
|
Do you feel stress from the Iraqi War?
(NP=Nonpolitical,VL=Very Liberal, L=Liberal, M=Moderate, LB=Libertarian,C=Conservative,VC=Very
Conservative)
As can be seen
in the above table, most people report feeling some level of stress
from the Iraqi War. This is particularly true of females. As can also
be seen, the perceived level of stress decreases as one goes from
left to right on the political spectrum.
The
Liberals, on average, report the highest rates of overall stress from
the Iraqi war, while the Conservatives report the lowest. This is not
surprising, as Liberals, on average, report the highest levels of general
stress, and Conservatives, on average, report the lowest.
On average, females have lower rates of support for the Iraqi war than
do males, but this varies by political cohort. Within the Liberal and
Conservative cohorts, female and male support are nearly equal.
However, female support for the Iraqi war is significantly lower among
both the Moderates and Libertarians. Coincidentally, the Moderate and
Libertarian females report much higher levels of warfare stress than
their male counterparts.
In
the adjacent
article, Every Picture Tells a Story, Conservative and Liberal
stress from the Iraqi war seems to be triggered by different cues, as
seen in the wide variation in emotional responses to our sample of five
pictures.
______________________________________________________
Surrogate
Warfare
Conservatives,
Liberals, and Sports

The American Conservative Sport
Except
for reproduction, modern sports may tell us more about the evolution
of humans than any other behavior. Humans have evolved from a long line
of animals that have adapted multiple modes of aggression, from subtle
dominance displays to wars of extermination.
These
multiple modes of aggression show up first in the invertebrates, who
exhibit a surprising amount of discretion when it comes to picking a
fight. Like ritualized reproductive behavior, ritualized fighting, its
close cousin, has been observed across a wide spectrum of invertebrates
and vertebrates, where the opponents deliberately engage in less deadly
fighting techniques to minimize damage to their opponents, while still
obtaining the resources they are competing for.
In
modern-day societies, humans have carried this to the extreme, and as
a result, their competition over resources rarely turns violent. Adult
humans exhibit some of the lowest rates of intraspecies violence seen
among the primates, especially given their remarkably high population
densities.
But
as the rate of violent death plummeted from the double-digit levels
of human prehistory to less than 0.2% in modern societies, humans have
been making up for the deficit by adding to their inventory of surrogate
violence. This is more recently observed in the surge of violence in
modern video games, movies, and sports. Eliminating these surrogate
forms of violence will be as difficult as eliminating their positive
impact on the dopamine reward system.
The
way people react to their favorite sports team winning a championship
is identical to the way our distant ancestors felt after they defeated
an enemy in battle--testosterone levels increase and dopamine pumps
through the neurons modulating reward. But what does our present appetite
for sports tell us about our evolutionary prehistory? Further, what
does it tell us about Conservatives and Liberals?
American
Football
American
football has a special status among the sports, as it is the only sport
preferred by majorities in several of our political-gender cohorts.
For Americans, no other sport comes close. It is also the sport that
most closely resembles coordinated combat between small bands of males.
The forces created by the numerous and violent collisions during a football
game exceeds all other team sports.
We
asked the 3,267 American respondents to our survey to choose their favorite
sport, and those preferring American football are displayed in the graph
below.

Favorite American Sport: Football
(NP=Nonpolitical,VL=Very Liberal, L=Liberal, M=Moderate, LB=Libertarian,C=Conservative,VC=Very
Conservative)
(M=Male,F=Female)
As
can be seen, football was the favorite sport of the majority of American
Conservative and Very Conservative males, and by a very wide margin
over the next most popular sport, baseball. It was also selected first
by American Liberal males, but not by a very wide margin over their
next favorite, which was surprisingly soccer. The American Very Liberals
actually preferred soccer over football. The Libertarian males selected
football first, followed by hockey. The American Nonpolitical males
selected football first, but at rates similar to Liberals. Soccer was
their next most popular choice.
Among
females, football was also very popular among the Very Conservatives,
Conservatives, and Moderates, as it was their favorite choice by quite
a margin. The other females were not as supportive, and football was
not the first choice of American Very Liberals, Liberals, Libertarians,
and Nonpoliticals.
American
Football and Support for the Iraqi War
Support
for the Iraqi war was stronger for both American Conservatives and Liberals
if they indicated that American football was their favorite sport. In
the graph below, we show the percentages of those supporting the war
of those that selected football versus those that selected another sport.

Support for the Iraqi War: The Football Factor
(VL= Very Liberal, L=Very Liberal, VC=Very Conservative, C=Conservative)
(M=Male, F=Female)
Among
both American Conservatives and Liberals, the preference for football
and the support for the Iraqi War are correlated variables. Liberals
that still support the war are few and far between, but if they do support
the war, they are about 7 times more likely to indicate that football
is their favorite sport. The Conservatives are about 11% more likely
to support the war if football is their favorite sport.
Sports
Preferences by Political Cohort
The
table below displays the favorite sports selected by political-gender
cohorts. We only included the top five sports selected.
|
Gender
|
Political Cohort
|
|
|
|
Soccer
|
Hockey
|
|
Female
|
NP
|
14.9%
|
11.9%
|
10.5%
|
23.9%
|
9.0%
|
|
Female
|
VL
|
14.4%
|
13.8%
|
17.7%
|
21.6%
|
9.9%
|
|
Female
|
L
|
18.2%
|
19.2%
|
15.4%
|
16.8%
|
8.4%
|
|
Female
|
LB
|
16.7%
|
18.8%
|
16.7%
|
4.2%
|
6.3%
|
|
Female
|
M
|
30.8%
|
26.0%
|
6.7%
|
6.7%
|
7.7%
|
|
Female
|
C
|
38.9%
|
22.9%
|
9.7%
|
5.6%
|
6.9%
|
|
Female
|
VC
|
46.4%
|
18.8%
|
4.4%
|
1.4%
|
7.3%
|
|
Male
|
NP
|
26.4%
|
8.2%
|
6.6%
|
14.8%
|
10.4%
|
|
Male
|
VL
|
17.2%
|
16.8%
|
10.5%
|
19.6%
|
6.7%
|
|
Male
|
L
|
28.5%
|
12.1%
|
8.6%
|
16.9%
|
14.5%
|
|
Male
|
LB
|
40.5%
|
8.6%
|
4.3%
|
10.1%
|
11.0%
|
|
Male
|
M
|
42.2%
|
8.0%
|
7.3%
|
12.2%
|
9.5%
|
|
Male
|
C
|
56.8%
|
12.8%
|
5.9%
|
5.3%
|
6.2%
|
|
Male
|
VC
|
52.7%
|
14.4%
|
4.8%
|
2.4%
|
8.2%
|
Favorite Sports of Americans by Political-Gender
Cohorts
(NP=Nonpolitical,VL=Very Liberal, L=Liberal, M=Moderate, LB=Libertarian,C=Conservative,VC=Very
Conservative)
(M=Male,F=Female)
The
above table shows some interesting trends. First, the American Conservatives
tend to like football and baseball, and less inclined to prefer basketball,
hockey, and soccer. The sports preferences of Liberals are more evenly
distributed among all the sports. Remarkably, the American Liberals
and the Nonpolitical have a high preference for soccer, something that
the Conservatives do not share.
Discussion
What
does the Conservative preference for football mean? Is it an indicator
of their enhanced tendency to organize into hierarchical social groups
and wage intergroup competition? Football is notable by highly organized
and interdependent motions of all the players, and a large number of
high energy collisions between opponents. It emulates human combat better
than most other team sports.
The
fact that the preference for American football correlates with
support for the Iraqi war, even within the same political cohort, is
certainly interesting. Also interesting was the fact that Conservatives
that preferred football indicated that they would be more willing to
risk their life to fight in the Iraq war than those Conservatives that
preferred another sport.
However,
we are going to hold our discussion on how political and religious affiliation
relates to the phenomenon of sacrificing one's life for another day.
___________________________________________
Beauty,
Economic Development, and the Slow Growing Human Brain

Beautiful Females, Big Cities, and Slow Growing Brains
What
course would economic development have taken if there were no females?
In a world consisting only of males, there would undoubtedly be fewer
clothes, fewer shoes, fewer nice restaurants, smaller homes, more trucks,
more guns, and a large number of golf courses.
In
modern economies, the production of economic goods vastly exceeds the
minimum necessary to sustain even an expanding population, which begs
the question--why do humans persist in working instead of converting
their increased productivity into more leisure time?
The
strong influence of culture on economic behavior is seen in the wide
differences in the average hours worked by country. In America, in 2002,
the average worker toiled about 1,815 hours a year, while workers in
the Netherlands spent only 1,340 hours at the job. While the average
person in France works about 24% less hours than they did 40 years ago,
the average American works about 20% more.
The
factors contributing to the puzzling American obsession with work are
no doubt numerous, but one doesn't have to look very long to find one
the chief culprits--birth rates. The United States maintains unusually
high birth rates for an industrialized economy, much higher than the
Northern European countries, which coincidentally, spend much less time
on the job.
However,
birth rates do not account for all the idiosyncrasies of economic behavior.
Globally, birth rates tend to be inversely proportional to level of
industrialization.
In the social science of economics, not much is heard about evolution,
which is ironic, as both Darwin and Wallace came up with the idea of
natural selection while reading Thomas Malthus' Essay on
the Principle of Population, which proposes a catastropic disparity
between human population growth and economic growth.
While
modern day economic behavior has natural selection written all
over it, a substantial proportion of it has been driven by the Darwinian
principle of sexual selection, and runaway sexual selection
at that.
Sexual
selection has been implicated in the evolution of many human attributes,
from the hairless body to the substantial human propensity for art and
music. Whether these traits are survivally neutral is debatable, as
they both seem to have positive survival value. Sexual selection
promotes trait shifts in populations, and the traits that are not survivally
neutral are subject to the ordinary rules of natural selection.
Runaway
sexual selection was first articulated by Ronald Fisher,
and simply put, is a process whereby a genetic trait is attractive to
the opposite sex, and the resultant offspring contain both the genes
for the desirable trait and the disposition towards attraction to that
trait. Over time, this increase in the combinatorial probability of
these genes can dramatically increase their overall presence in the
population gene pool. For example, taller males are generally preferred
by females, and the offspring of such a union will contain both the
trait and the attraction to that trait.
The
traits involved in modern economic behavior have been under severe evolutionary
pressures, to say the least. Such phylogenetically ancient behaviors
as predation, foraging, nest and shelter construction, agriculture,
tool-making, territoriality, exploration, and storing food have been
taken to extraordinary levels in humans.
The
human species is notable by the unprecedented reproductive value of
the males. Besides providing sperm, the males of most species have limited
or no reproductive value. Humans are also notable by their unusually
high degree of labor specialization, particularly between the sexes,
which is mainly attributable to the long-term and substantial investment
that human females make in child-rearing.
This
long-term investment in human offspring is directly related to the longer
time required for human brain growth. Coincidentally, females selected
the males with higher energy yields of their economic behavior. Economic
development is mostly about energy, whether it is the energy stored
up in a gallon of gasoline, an item of food, or the energy saved by
the human body while living in a warm house.
Human economic behavior has increased the energy utilization per person,
which translates directly into longer periods of offspring investment
and correspondingly longer periods for brain growth, not to mention
the positive impact on population growth in general.
While
females were highly specialized in foraging and nest construction, these
behaviors were not adequate to support the energy investment required
for human offspring. This would leave the males to fill the energy gap.
The development of large scale irrigation systems, transportation systems,
construction, mining, manufacturing, etc, were the domain of the male,
and added dramatically to the energy yield of a habitat, and plugged
the gap in the energy requirements of raising children and ultimately
supporting the slow development of the human nervous system.
An
economically productive male could actually support offspring investment
to a higher degree than a female, and further, would send the human
species down a pathway of reciprocal sexual selection, where both males
and females were applying criteria in selecting mates.
Males were heavily selected for economic criteria, and females were
heavily selected for a variety of reproductive fitness cues, such as
hair and skin quality, breast size, lip color and shape, waist-to-hip
ratio, etc. In short, females were selected for all those traits that
currently are enhanced by the modern day cosmetic, dental, and plastic
surgery industries.
Male
wealth and female beauty have become reproductively intertwined, as
seen in the elevated proportions of beautiful females in economically
advantaged areas, such as the better parts of large cities. This process
of runaway sexual selection has hidden the fact that it originally
supported the high energy requirements of the slow growing human brain.